Rented normally, you'd make about £248 a month.

Will it pay?Calculator

£248 of every £1,461 is yours to keep, each month

You keep 17p of every pound of rent. The mortgage takes 35p.

+£1,461−£508−£646−£58£248

Rent inMortgageRunning costsTaxProfit

Rent £1,461, modelled from 75 nearby lettings within 500 m

□ service charge not published2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£46,125 + refurb costs

£14,875 of that never comes back — LBTT, solicitor and lender fees.

£46,125 to buy it

~£14,775

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · feeswe haven’t been inside

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?

Nothing — it works at the asking price

The rent covers the mortgage, the running costs and the tax at the £125,000 asked, so there is no discount this card has to name. A lower price would be upside, not a condition.

◧ worked back from the rent

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £130,000 in 2026

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 4% less than the £130,000 paid for it in 2026.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

Can we trust the rent?Rent evidence

Nearby lettings back this rent

We hold too few nearby asking rents to cross-check this figure, so nothing here confirms it a second way.

+65 more

our bar: 10 within 500 m

our own middle half£1,302–£1,639/mo

■ 75 lettings within 500 m□ no nearby asks to cross-checkAdvertised rents, not signed tenancies

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries the whole loan — it could fall 40% and still cover it

Your deposit is what limits this one, not the rent. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£850 needed

of £1,405 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,405PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 904 sq ft

Only the agent’s figure exists for this house. Open for what that means.

□ area unchecked — agent’s own

Is it a good location?Open the map

Glasgow, G5 8AF

No schools in this postcode area and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ postcode area, not this address

What to know before you offerThe checks

Every tenancy here is periodic, with no Section 21 to end it

Tenancies are now periodic, with no Section 21 — budget a longer void.

1 problem found · 1 came back clear · 5 we could not check · 2 do not apply to this property

■ from the Renters’ Rights Act 2025listing last seen 18 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Rent by the room beats Standard rental by £187 a month

Let it to the council: £1,836 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Rent by the room+£435 · £86,900 in

Standard rental+£248 · £60,900 in

Guaranteed council rent+£95 · £60,900 in

Housing-benefit rent−£156 · £60,900 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

+£6,398 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 29% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £60,900 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£60,900+£148,613−£3,715−£93,750+£16,150+£6,398

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent keptYou walk with

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed